When mentioning the ‘water crisis’, the Indonesian central government tends to favor large infrastructural solutions. These are usually packaged in a so-called ‘national strategic project’ which is fit to attract private investments and allow the project to prevail over previous, and possibly more environmentally friendly, regional regulation and land planning.
Examples of these projects include the construction of a giant seawall topped-up by a toll road along the coast to reduce floods, large water desalination plants, and the construction of dams and reservoirs[11].
Both activists and researchers have criticized this pattern for being shortsighted, for their incapacity to address the root of the water crisis, and for their detrimental environmental and social impacts, including worsening land subsidence. This is the cause of the crisis, perversely framed as a solution, argues the activists and researchers coalition Maleh dadi Segoro [12].
Researchers and activists studies help to see the water crisis in Semarang and more broadly Java, in another light. The history of water access in Semarang explains that water scarcity and floods coexist, since both water issues take their root in the extreme reliance on groundwater extraction. It also highlights which political choices allowed this reliance to grow since 1840.
In short, water scarcity in Semarang is unevenly distributed due to a social-ecological crisis whose main protagonist is groundwater.