This autonomy and cultural links amidst villages of Sierra del Segura and other surrounding territories (which extend beyond the Segura basin) contributed to conform a ‘speech community’ with an extraordinarily abundant vocabulary related to water and irrigated agriculture. Hence, communities of irrigators like Fuentes de Letur (Letur) or La Mora y Los Tollos (Férez) historically constructed meanings of water access and use that became inscribed in language, signs, and codes, but also in the materials of ‘traditional’ infrastructures and technologies and the biodiversity associated to them. In this sense, the interactions that emerge from ‘human’ and ‘non-human’ actors within these communal irrigation systems have political implications that shape livelihoods and agroecosystems.
However, much of the infrastructures, cultural practices, and associated ecosystems of ‘traditional’ irrigation systems are disappearing with the ‘modernization’ of irrigation systems, impacting the languages and knowledges of these communities of irrigators. State-led initiatives of ‘modernization’ have managed to transform 73% of the irrigation systems in the basin in 2022 (CHS), pioneering an irrigation transformation in Spain that is expanding rapidly to other regions of the country. This radical shift not only implies a significant loss in terms of diversity of vocabularies, practices, and ways of knowing; it also entails a transformation of the local political orders that are progressively assimilated by centralized basin dynamics, jeopardizing the very existence of communal irrigation.
In 2003, the Castilla-La Mancha Government officially declared the ‘modernization’ of the irrigation systems of “Elche de la Sierra, Férez, Liétor, Letur, Socovos, and others” of general interest (BOE, 2003b, p. 46944), all located in Sierra del Segura. This decree included a broad number of communities of irrigators, some of which never requested the ‘modernization’ of their systems, as it was the case of Letur. The top-down nature of these ‘modernization’ plans, fostered by municipal and regional authorities, reveals how power relations manifest in spatial practices, including the production and control of space by dominant groups.